• Users Online: 150
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 55  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 215-220

Comparative study between sublay (retrorectus) and onlay mesh placement in ventral hernia repair at a teaching hospital


Department of General Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Salman Naseem Shaikh
Flat 101, Sai Water Crest, Jambhulwadi Lake Road, Ambegaon Budruk, Pune - 411 046, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/fjs.fjs_123_22

Rights and Permissions

Background: Anterior abdominal wall defects give rise to ventral hernias. Treatment modalities vary from surgical options such as open procedure, laparoscopic method to further advanced robotic surgeries. The present study aimed to find the comparison between the postoperative and short term outcomes of onlay and retrorectus (sublay) mesh placements as ventral hernia repair methods. Materials and Methods: Our enrolled ventral hernia patients were divided into two groups of 20 each. Group A underwent traditional open onlay mesh repair and group B had open sublay/retrorectus mesh hernia repair. Age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, and past surgical history, among both groups, were comparable. Results: The duration of surgery was significantly shorter in onlay group. The sublay group was related to fewer postsurgical complications and shorter duration of drain insertion. The duration of hospital stay had no statistical significance. Conclusion: Both techniques have their pros and cons and further research is required to determine a superlative.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed591    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded89    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal